COURTESY OF THE ESTATE OF DR. EILAT MAZAR/PHOTO BY OURIA TADMOR
The story of King Solomon and the Queen of Sheba is one of the more intriguing accounts found within the narrative of Solomon’s reign (1 Kings 10). Yet the lack of clear evidence for early trade or political connections between ancient Judah and South Arabia has led many scholars to question the account’s reliability. Now, one scholar believes a small inscription from the Ophel excavations in Jerusalem may provide the missing proof.
Discovered in 2012, the small inscription, which includes just seven letters, has puzzled scholars for years. Although most have assumed the inscription is written in Canaanite, Daniel Vainstub of Ben-Gurion University believes it is written in an ancient South Arabian script known as Sabaic, the language of the ancient kingdom of Saba (biblical Sheba) in the area of modern Yemen.
Dated to the tenth century BCE—the time of the biblical King Solomon—the inscription could provide evidence of trade connections between ancient South Arabia and Jerusalem during this early period. According to Vainstub, the inscription contains three full or partially preserved words: [ ]šy ldn 5. (Vainstub believes the South Arabian letter ḫ was used to designate the number 5.) Intriguingly, the second word, which Vainstub reads as ladanum, is a type of resin possibly to be identified with onycha, one of the ingredients used to create incense burned at the tabernacle (Exodus 30:34).
The inscription was engraved on a large Judahite storage jar that probably held around 30 gallons, or 5 ephahs, the standard volume measure in ancient Judah. According to Vainstub, this suggests that the number 5 in the inscription indicates the amount of resin that was held by the jar. Given that the Sabaic inscription was made before the jar was fired, it was likely written by a native Sabean, perhaps a merchant living in Jerusalem.
Not everyone is convinced by Vainstub’s reading or interpretation. But if his interpretation is correct, the small inscription—discovered just 300 yards from the presumed location of Solomon’s Temple—could offer important evidence of early trade connections between Judah and South Arabia and, therefore, the historicity of the biblical story of Solomon and Sheba.
The story of King Solomon and the Queen of Sheba is one of the more intriguing accounts found within the narrative of Solomon’s reign (1 Kings 10). Yet the lack of clear evidence for early trade or political connections between ancient Judah and South Arabia has led many scholars to question the account’s reliability. Now, one scholar believes a small inscription from the Ophel excavations in Jerusalem may provide the missing proof. Discovered in 2012, the small inscription, which includes just seven letters, has puzzled scholars for years. Although most have assumed the inscription is written in Canaanite, Daniel Vainstub […]