Predilections—Is the “Brother of Jesus” Inscription a Forgery? - The BAS Library

You have already read your free article for this month. Please join the BAS Library or become an All Access member of BAS to gain full access to this article and so much more.

Join the BAS Library!

Already a library member? Log in here.

Institution user? Log in with your IP address or Username

Footnotes

1.

André Lemaire, “Burial Box of James the Brother of Jesus,BAR 28:06.

2.

The Storm over the Bone Box,BAR 29:05.

3.

Hershel Shanks, “‘Brother of Jesus’ Inscription Is Authentic!BAR 38:04.

4.

Update: Finds or Fakes?BAR 31:02.

Endnotes

1.

Pieter W. van der Horst, Saxa Judaica Loquuntur: Lessons from Early Jewish Inscriptions, Biblical Interpretation Series 134 (Leiden: Brill, 2015), pp. 67–87.

2.

Van der Horst, Saxa Judaica Loquuntur, p. 79.

3.

The following quotes are from Van der Horst, Saxa Judaica Loquuntur, pp. 79­–81.

4.

Van der Horst, Saxa Judaica Loquuntur, pp. 81, 83.

5.

Van der Horst, Saxa Judaica Loquuntur, p. 84, note 44.

6.

In a Christmas interview in 2013, Rollston offered “to wager that the second half [of the inscription] was added in modern times.” By March 2015, the chances went up to 75–85 percent, but no additional explanation was given.

7.

Christopher Rollston, “The James Ossuary (Ya‘akov Ossuary): Bullet Point Synopsis About a Probable Modern Forgery,” Rollston Epigraphy (blog), March 22, 2015, www.rollstonepigraphy.com/?p=699.

8.

Horace, Ars Poetica 359.

9.

If Golan owned the ossuary since the mid-1970s, it would be impossible for it to have come from the Talpiot tomb, as suggested by James Tabor, among others. The tomb was not excavated until 1980.