Just as archaeological finds flesh out Israelite history, so they also tell us about Israel’s neighbors and sometime enemies. Such is the case with the Ammonites, a people who lived east of the Jordan and fought in league with the Philistines against the emerging Israelites (Judges 10:7–9). Both Saul and David engaged the Ammonites in battle (1 Samuel 11; 2 Samuel 11:1). At one point, David’s forces besieged the Ammonite capital, Rabbah (2 Samuel 11:1). The remains of the Ammonite capital lie beneath the modern capital of Jordan, Amman, whose name preserves the name of the ancient people.
The Ammonites continued to live across the Jordan from the Israelites for centuries and are often referred to in the Bible. Much of what we know about them we learn from archaeology.
Very recently the seal of an Ammonite king has come to light. This is the first time that we have found the seal of an Ammonite king, and this is its first public announcement. What makes this seal especially exciting is that the king who owned the seal, a certain Ba‘alis, is also referred to in the Bible.
When the Babylonians conquered Judah in the early sixth century B.C.E. and destroyed Jerusalem, they made Gedaliah, who was from a prominent Jerusalem family, governor of Judah. Gedaliah, however, was soon murdered, an event still commemorated in Jewish tradition by a yearly fast. The assassin was sent by none other than Ba‘alis, king of the Ammonites (Jeremiah 40:13–41:2).
Ba‘alis’s seal (shown on the cover of this issue; the seal impression appears below) is made of brown agate with white bands and is in fact quite tiny (.5 inches in diameter and .2 inches thick). A small hole was drilled through the center of the scarab-shaped seal for the setting. On the seal are three lines of script, each separated by double rules:
Line 1: [[]vyl[b[l]] ([l]bôlysû[‘]) “[Belonging to] Ba‘alisû[‘]”
Line 2: ûlm (ml/k) “King of”
Line 3: ÷[m[÷]b (b[n’m]n) “B[nei Ammo]n.”
As indicated by the brackets, the first and last letters in the first line have been reconstructed, but their reconstruction was easy.1 Almost all seals begin with a lamed, or l, meaning “belonging to.” The last letter of the line, also missing, completes the spelling of the name.
Much more needs to be reconstructed in the damaged third line. Only traces of the first and last letters are visible: the head of the first letter, bet, and the 048upper edge of the last letter, nun. But this is enough to reconstruct the line as Bnei Ammon—literally, the Sons of Ammon, or the Ammonites—since the named king, Ba‘alis, is known as an Ammonite king. Indeed, in the Biblical passage that mentions Ba‘alis (Jeremiah 40:14), he is referred to as the “King [of the] Bnei Ammon,” the same term that we have reconstructed here based on the first and last letters. The same term appears on a well-known bronze bottle, called a situla (see next photo), found at Tell Siran in Jordan.2
The script on our seal is typically Ammonite. It is a mark of how far our epigraphic knowledge has developed that we can distinguish between the closely related scripts of the Israelites, the Ammonites, the Moabites and the Edomites.3
The name Ba‘alis means “Ba‘al has saved,” or “Ba‘al is salvation.”
This is not the first time Ba‘alis has appeared in the archaeological record. His name also appears in an inscription excavated at Tel el-’Umeiri in Jordan (see drawing). This seal impression, which was made by a high official of the king, reads “Milqom, servant of Ba‘alis.”4
The iconography of the royal Ba‘alis seal is as interesting as its inscription: The center and largest register depicts a winged sphinx wearing an Egyptian-style apron. Although the Egyptian influence is clear and strong, just as it is in Israelite culture (perhaps mediated through Phoenicia), the sphinx here has identifying characteristics particular to Ammonite culture. The sphinx has a tail in the shape of the letter s: It curves upward to the right and then finishes in a loop to the left.
An identical sphinx is depicted on another Ammonite seal belonging to one “Pado’el.”5 Pado’el’s seal does not give his title, but we know from cuneiform texts from Mesopotamia that Pado’el was the name of an Ammonite king.6 If, as appears likely, this type of sphinx was an Ammonite royal emblem, the seal of Pado’el probably belonged to the king himself, even though the seal does not identify him as such. Buttressing the suggestion that this is a royal symbol is an Edomite seal impression bearing the name of the Edomite king Qosgabri, which contains a very similar sphinx with an identical tail (see the last photo in this article).7 Apparently this was a royal emblem in both Edom and Ammon.
049
Still another Ammonite king appears in a bulla also being published here for the first time, but this Ammonite king is otherwise unknown. This bulla (photo below) comes from the collection of Shlomo Moussaieff. It is made of black clay and is only a little more than a half inch in diameter. The seal impression on the clay is about a quarter of an inch in diameter. A groove around the seal impression indicates that the seal was set in a metal bezel. On the back of the bulla we can see the impression of the cord that tied the document and the texture of the papyrus roll sealed by the bulla. Around the edge appear fingerprints that could well belong to the king himself.
Strangely, for a king, his seal is purely epigraphic; it contains nothing but an inscription. Ammonite seals are usually rich in iconography. Perhaps the royal emblem was on the back of the seal, in which case it would not appear on the bulla.
The inscription is divided into two registers by the common double line and is surrounded by a framing border line. The letters are typically Ammonite.8 Two dots are marked at the end of the second line to fill the empty space. The bulla, like the seal of Ba‘alis, was purchased in London from a Jordanian antiquities dealer.
The inscription reads
Line 1: lakdbl (lbrk’l) “Belonging to Barak’el”
Line 2: ûlmh (hmlk) “the king.”
The name Barak-el means “Blessed of God (El).” “El” is a generic term for God used in the Hebrew Bible. The same name also appears in the Bible: The father of Job’s friend Elihu is named Barak-el (Barachel) (Job 32:2, 6).
The name was apparently common among the Ammonites. We know of three Ammonites called Barak-el.9 However, now we know that there was a hitherto unknown king by this name as well. The paleography—the shape and form of the letters—indicates that he ruled sometime in the first half of the seventh century B.C.E.
The list of known Ammonite kings is short, so the discovery of a new one is especially important. Some are mentioned in the Bible. In addition to Ba‘alis, the Bible also refers to an Ammonite king named Nahash, who threatened to gouge out the right eyes of the men of Jabesh-Gilead (1 Samuel 11:1–2). Nahash ruled in the tenth century B.C.E. (the time of David). Nahash’s son, who succeeded him as king, is identified as Hanun (1 Chronicles 19:1–2). A number of other Ammonite kings are known from cuneiform inscriptions. The total, until the appearance of Barak-el, was nine. Now it is ten.
048
The Kings of Ammon
Name
Date
Nahash
10th century B.C.E.
Hanun
10th century B.C.E.
Ba’sha
c. 853 B.C.E.
Shanip
c. 735 B.C.E.
Pado’el
before 701 B.C.E.
Barak-el
c. 675 B.C.E.
Amminadab I
c. 650 B.C.E.
Hissal’
c. 625 B.C.E.
Amminada II
c. 600 B.C.E.
Ba’alis
c. 580 B.C.E.
Just as archaeological finds flesh out Israelite history, so they also tell us about Israel’s neighbors and sometime enemies. Such is the case with the Ammonites, a people who lived east of the Jordan and fought in league with the Philistines against the emerging Israelites (Judges 10:7–9). Both Saul and David engaged the Ammonites in battle (1 Samuel 11; 2 Samuel 11:1). At one point, David’s forces besieged the Ammonite capital, Rabbah (2 Samuel 11:1). The remains of the Ammonite capital lie beneath the modern capital of Jordan, Amman, whose name preserves the name of the ancient people. The […]
You have already read your free article for this month. Please join the BAS Library or become an All Access member of BAS to gain full access to this article and so much more.
Although the upper part of the yod and most of the shin are damaged, they are nevertheless legible.
2.
See H.O. Thompson and Fawzi Zayadine, in The Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 212 (1973).
3.
Indicative letters are mem and kaf; kaf is formed by a vertical line with a triangle on its left. The letters bet and ayin are open on their upper parts.
4.
Larry Herr, “The Servant of Baalis,” Biblical Archaeologist 48 (1985), pp. 169–172.
5.
See Nahman Avigad and Benjamin Sass, Corpus of West Semitic Seals (Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Israel Exploration Society, Hebrew Univ., Institute of Archaeology, 1997), no. 965.
6.
See James Pritchard, ed., Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament, 3rd ed. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1969).
7.
C.M. Bennett, ed., “Fouilles d’Umm el-Biara rapport préliminaire,” Revue biblique 73 (1966), pp. 372–403.
8.
The mem has a large w-like head with a vertical line on its right; the two kafs are similar to the numeral four.
9.
See “Barak’el son of ’Elishama‘,” in Avigad, “Another Group of West-Semitic Seals from the Hecht Collection,” Michmanim (1989), p. 15, no. 16; “Menahem son of Barak’el,” in Pierre Bordreuil, Catalogue des Sceaux Ouest-Sémitiques Inscrits (1986), p. 67, no. 75; “Batash Steward of Barak’el,” in M.F. Martin, “Six Palestinian Seals,” Revista degli Studi Orientali 39 (1964), pp. 203–210.