Footnotes

1.

On these early Christian texts, see David R. Cartlidge, “The Christian Apocrypha: Preserved in Art,” BR 13:03.

2.

For more on the conflicting gospel accounts of Jesus’ birth, see “Where Was Jesus Born?”—a debate between Steve Mason and Jerome Murphy-O’Connor in BR 16:01.

3.

To be sure, Mary’s designation as a virgin, parthenos (Matthew 1:23, citing Isaiah 7:14; Luke 1:27), contributed to her characterization. But see J. Edward Barrett, “Can Scholars Take the Virgin Birth Seriously?” BR 04:05; and James E. Crouch, “How Early Christians Viewed the Birth of Jesus,” BR 07:05.

4.

For more on Jesus’ family, see Richard J. Bauckham, “All in the Family,” BR 16:02.

5.

Joseph’s decision is inappropriate in the context of the Infancy Gospel, where Mary is Joseph’s ward and not his wife. Apparently, the author borrowed the phrase from Matthew 1:19 without taking into consideration the changed circumstances of his own narrative.

6.

The author of the text seems to have in mind something like the ritual of the water of bitterness for unfaithful wives, outlined in Numbers 5:11–31, although the procedures here are rather different, in particular the application of the test to a man.

Endnotes

1.

For further reading on Mary, see Beverly Roberts Gaventa, Mary: Glimpses of the Mother of Jesus (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1999); and Jaroslav Pelikan, Mary Through the Centuries (New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1996).

2.

Citations follow Ronald F. Hock, The Infancy Gospels of James and Thomas, The Scholars Bible 2 (Sonoma, CA: Polebridge Press, 1995).

3.

That the Gospel of James depends on Matthew and Luke, and not the other way around, is easily demonstrated. For example, Joseph’s decision to dismiss or divorce Mary quietly (James 14:4) recalls a nearly identical remark in Matthew’s account (Matthew 1:19), but in James it makes little sense since marriage is never contemplated. It does fit the situation in Matthew, however, suggesting that Matthew is the source.

Furthermore, this gospel answers a question that only arises when both the Matthean and Lukan birth accounts are known. Matthew contains Herod’s murder of the infants (Matthew 2:16–18), but does not mention the birth of John. Luke mentions both the births of Jesus and John (Luke 1:57, 2:7), but does not include the murder of the infants. But reading both canonical gospels, a question arises: How did John escape Herod’s soldiers? The Infancy Gospel of James answers this question, revealing that the author knew of the two canonical birth stories.

4.

Josephus, Antiquities 2.200.

5.

Clement of Alexandria, Stromata 7.16.93. Origen, Commentarium in evangelium Matthaei 10:17.

6.

Vasiliki Limberis, Divine Heiress: The Virgin Mary and the Creation of Christian Constantinople (New York: Routledge, 1994), pp. 47–61