Please join the BAS Library or become an All Access member of BAS to gain full access to this article and so much more.
Already a library member? Log in here.
Institution user? Log in with your IP address or Username
Footnotes
My economist friends tell me that relegating the purchase and sale of looted antiquities to the black market would likely increase their price. The competition for looted pieces would be just as intense as long as there were a significant number of buyers. So the price would go up because (1) the costs of making transactions would increase and (2) the product would be rarer. No longer could people see the items in a museum; the only way to enjoy them would be to buy them—on the black market, at prices perhaps even higher because the objects could no longer be viewed elsewhere.
See, for example, Frank Moore Cross, “King Hezekiah’s Seal Bears Phoenician Imagery,” BAR 25:02; Hershel Shanks, “Leading Archaeologist Chastised for Publishing Artifacts in Private Collections,” BAR 23:06; P. Kyle McCarter, Jr., “In Private Hands,” BAR 22:02; and Nahman Avigad, Hebrew Bullae from the Time of Jeremiah: Remnants of a Burnt Archive (Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 1986).
See “AIA: ‘Okay to Publicize Grants from Antiquities Collectors’,” Strata, BAR 24:05.
See Avner Raban, “Stop the Charade: It’s Time to Sell Artifacts,” BAR 23:03.