In Greek, the language of the early church, the capital tau, or T, looks pretty much like our T. The capital rho, or R, however, is written like our P.
If you superimpose the two letters, it looks something like this: . The earliest Christian uses of this tau-rho combination make it what is called a staurogram. In Greek the verb to “crucify” is stauroō; a “cross” is a stauros. In scholarly terms a combination of letters like this is called a compendium, a monogram-like device, in this case (in the earliest Christian uses) producing a pictographic representation of a crucified figure hanging on a cross—used in the Greek words for “crucify” and “cross.”


It is a commonplace belief among historians of the early church that early Christianity did not emphasize Jesus’ crucifixion and that this did not change until the late fourth or fifth century. Crucifixion was shameful, and so (so the theory goes) Christians would have been hesitant to draw attention to the crucified Jesus. Indeed, some scholars have inferred from this the notion that pre-Constantinian Christianity avoided depictions of Jesus’ crucifixion.
But the staurogram seems to contradict this position, for the earliest extant examples of the staurogram date 150–200 years earlier than what have often been posited as the earliest Christian depictions of the crucified Jesus—that is, to about 200 C.E.
That the staurogram is intended as a depiction of the crucified Jesus is confirmed by the fact that in the earliest surviving Christian instances it is used in the word “crucify” (stauroō) and “cross” (stauros). In these instances, these words are written in a special “contracted” (abbreviated) manner, and the tau-rho compendium is part of this abbreviated form of the words.
The earliest example is a papyrus copy of the Gospel of John known as P66 (P. Bodmer II), dated to about 200 C.E.; the staurogram appears in the Greek words for “crucify” and “cross” in John 19:6, 15, 16, 18, 19, 25, 31. Likewise, in another early Gospel codex, P75 (P. Bodmer XIV–XV), including portions of Luke and John and dated to about the same time, there are further instances of the staurogram in the same two Greek words (Luke 9:23; 14:27; 24:7).1
From perhaps a bit later, in the Vienna fragment of P45, the earliest extant codex containing all four Gospels and Acts (c. 200–250 C.E.), we have an additional instance preserved in Matthew 26:2. Here, the word staurōthēnai (“to be crucified”) is written in a contracted way with a staurogram forming part of the abbreviation.
The staurogram is only one of several christograms, that is, monogram-like devices used by ancient Christians to refer to Jesus. The most widely known christogram is the chi-rho combination (), using the first two Greek letters of “Christ.”2 It is frequently seen on liturgical vestments as well as in icons and other ecclesiastical items. None, however, is as early as the examples of the staurograms cited above.


The staurogram is different from the other christograms in another respect: The staurogram does not refer to any name or title linked with Jesus. It refers only to crucifixion; it is a simple kind of picture. By contrast, the chi-rho sign refers to the word “Christ.” This is true of other christograms as well. The iota-chi combines the initial letters of the Greek words for “Jesus Christ” (
Unique among christograms, the letters of the tau-rho combination seem to be intended to refer visually to the crucified Jesus. This places the staurogram among the earliest extant expressions of a distinctive ancient Christian “visual culture.”3
Almost all of the christograms were also used in pre-Christian times, before they were adopted by Christians. This was true of the chi-rho combination, as well as for the tau-rho combination. The tau-rho combination appears in pre-Christian usage as an abbreviation for the Greek words tropos (“manner,” “direction”), trias (“three”) and triakas and triakondas (“thirty”). One interesting example of this usage is on coins of Herod the Great (37–4 B.C.E.) to mark the third year of his reign.4 The tau-rho device is also found on items from Dura Europos, apparently functioning as craftsmen’s marks.5 The chi-rho combination was used in the pre-Christian times as an abbreviation for various Greek words such as chronos (“time”) and chiliarch (“commander of a thousand”).6

Although the earliest Christian examples of the tau-rho date from about 200 C.E., as already noted, these examples are unlikely to have been the originating instances. We should probably assume that the first Christian appropriation of the tau-rho compendium occurred at least as early as the mid/late second century C.E. This makes the staurogram by far the earliest visual reference to the crucified Jesus,
In time christograms came to be used not only in texts but as free-standing symbols of Christ or Christian faith, for example on liturgical vestments and church utensils. This was probably also true of the staurogram, tau-rho; where it would represent simply an independent symbol of Christ or Christian faith. But the earliest use of the tau-rho was as a visual reference to Jesus’ crucifixion. As such, it is the earliest surviving depiction of Jesus’ crucifixion.7
MLA Citation
Endnotes
In the statements in Luke 9:23 and 14:27, Jesus is pictured as summoning followers to “take up daily” and “bear” their own crosses, but in each case there is a clear conceptual linkage also to Jesus’ own crucifixion.
The earlier view, sometimes still repeated, that these christograms emerged in the post-Constantian period—and that the chi-rho was the earliest and the tau-rho developed from it—are now all shown to be erroneous. These influential claims were made by M. Sulzberger, “Le symbole de la Croix et les monogrammes de Jésus chez les premiers Chrétiens,” Byzantion 2 (1925), pp. 337–448. Also shown to be incorrect is Sulzberger’s claim that there was no Christian use of the cross-symbol, no christogram, and no representation of Jesus’ crucifixion before the fourth century C.E. (p. 371). Among works that perpetuate Sulzberger’s views long after they were shown incorrect, see G.F. Snyder, Ante Pacem: Archaeological Evidence of Church Life Before Constantine (Macon, GA: Mercer Univ. Press, 1985; 2nd ed. 2003).
Other examples of this “visual culture” are the so-called nomina sacra. They included Theos (“God”), Kyrios (“Lord”), Iesous (“Jesus”) and Christos (“Christ”). By the Byzantine period, some 15 words were treated as nomina sacra. The nomina sacra were written in abbreviated form, but were intended to be read as if spelled fully. These abbreviations were apparently intended to set off these words visually from the surrounding text. There is no indication, however, that the nomina sacra were read out or pronounced in any different manner, or that there was any sort of reverential gesture used when these words were read out in worship services or privately.
Baruch Kanael, “The Coins of King Herod of the Third Year,” Jewish Quarterly Review 62 (1951–1952), pp. 261–264; Baruch Kanael, “Ancient Jewish Coins and Their Historical Importance,” Biblical Archaeologist 26 (1963), pp. 38–62, esp. 48.
R.N. Freye, J.F. Gillam, H. Inghold and C.B. Welles, “Inscriptions from Dura-Europos,” Yale Classical Studies 14 (1955), pp. 123–213, esp. 191–194.
Don Pasquale Colella, “Les abréviations ט et ,” Revue Biblique 80 (1973), pp. 547–558, who comments on chi-rho marks on non-Christian amphorae.
For fuller discussion and citation of scholarly publications, see L.W. Hurtado, The Earliest Christian Artifacts: Manuscripts and Christian Origins (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006), pp. 135–154; Larry W. Hurtado, “The Staurogram in Early Christian Manuscripts: The Earliest Visual Reference to the Crucified Jesus?” in T.J. Kraus and T. Nicklas, eds., New Testament Manuscripts: Their Texts and Their World (Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2006), pp. 207–226. The most important previous studies were by K. Aland, “Bemerkungen zum Alter und Entstehung des Christogramms anhand von Beobachtungen bei P66 und P75,” in Studien zur Überlieferung des Neuen Testaments und seines Textes (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1967), pp. 173–179; and Matthew Black, “The Chi-Rho Sign: Christogram and/or Staurogram?” in W.W. Gasque and R.P. Martin, eds., Apostolic History and the Gospel: Essays Presented to F.F. Bruce (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1970), pp. 319–327.