590
Te’o, Tel - The BAS Library

INTRODUCTION

Tel Te’o is located on the western margin of the Ḥula Valley, in a defile between the steep rocky slopes of the Naphtali Hills on the west, and what was until recent times an inlet of the now-drained Ḥula Swamp on the east. The site, covering some 7.5 a, stands on a small alluvial fan formed where a narrow gully issues into the valley, at 75–85 m above sea level. Three hundred meters to the north is ‘En Te’o (‘Ein Balatah), the water source of the site and one of the largest springs in the valley. Tel Te’o was discovered by Y. Stepansky during road construction works. A salvage excavation was conducted by E. Eisenberg, on behalf of the Israel Department of Antiquities (now the Israel Antiquities Authority), from March to September 1986. The site’s exceptional stratigraphic sequence, beginning in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B period and continuing, with a number of gaps, through the Pottery Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods to the Early Bronze Age II, represents an important contribution to the study of the late prehistory of northern Israel.

STRATIGRAPHY OF TEL TE’O Stratum Period
I Late Ottoman
II Medieval (?)
III Early Bronze II
V–IV Early Bronze IA
VII–VI Chalcolithic
X–VIII Pottery Neolithic
XIII–XI Pre-Pottery Neolithic B–C

EXCAVATION RESULTS

THE PRE-POTTERY NEOLITHIC PERIOD. Excavation in the lowest stratum (XIII) was in a limited area (12 sq m) and architectural remains were scanty, consisting of two beaten-earth floors, one of which was founded upon the alluvial fan underlying the site. Stratum XII yielded a corner of a rectangular house and a plastered floor, an architectural type well known from Pre-Pottery Neolithic B sites.


Additional lime-plaster floors were discerned in stratum XI, as was a portion of what appears to have been a corridor house. Its size is much smaller than corridor houses uncovered at Beidha, ‘Ain Ghazal, and Yiftaḥel, thus its attribution to this type of structure remains uncertain. The flint tool assemblage contained Amuq and probable Byblos points, which accord well with a very late Pre-Pottery Neolithic date, as well as typical large Pre-Pottery Neolithic B sickle blades together with a new type of coarsely denticulated, pressure-flaked sickle blades known from early Pottery Neolithic industries. Considering the entire Pre-Pottery Neolithic sequence as a single unit, the absence of pottery, the architectural remains, and the lithic assemblage indicate a relatively late position in the regional chronological framework, probably in the final Pre-Pottery Neolithic B or C period (first half of the sixth millennium BCE).

THE POTTERY NEOLITHIC PERIOD. Three distinct Pottery Neolithic strata were revealed, representing an accumulation of 1.2–1.5 m over an area of 100–200 sq m. Despite the relatively large exposure, architectural features were few and poorly preserved. Enough has survived, however, to indicate the presence of rectangular dwellings, their walls built of plano-convex mud bricks on stone foundations. The features most characteristic of these strata are subterranean stone-lined silos, a large number of hearths and trash pits, and human interments—mainly infant jar-burials beneath floors. The pottery indicates a gradual development: the earliest strata contain elements with affinities to earlier Neolithic cultures (Lodian, Jericho IX), while features hinting at Wadi Rabah or later horizons are also extant. The lithics, especially the pressure-flaked sickle blades, appear to be consistent with the pottery traditions exhibited. On this basis, strata X–VIII can be dated to the fifth millennium BCE.


THE CHALCOLITHIC PERIOD. Strata VII–VI represent two consecutive phases of settlement during the Chalcolithic period. The most conspicuous feature of the buildings in these strata is they were built exclusively of stone, and are thus better preserved than those of the earlier Pottery Neolithic strata. The main feature in stratum VII was an enclosed dwelling compound comprised of three buildings sharing a central courtyard. Stratum VI represents a gradual process of expansion and construction in open spaces, as well as reconstruction and replacement of some of the earlier structures, indicative of settlement planning and spatial organization. The principles of construction were based on rectangular broad-houses with sunken floors. The interiors were divided into two or three rooms of unequal size, the main room occupying between one half and three quarters of the entire floor area. Four individuals were interred, without grave goods, beneath the ancillary rooms in the courtyard. Two were found articulated in a flexed position, the other two burials comprised a number of adult bones. Dominant features in these strata were deep and shallow cylindrical silos in both houses and courtyards, providing ample testimony to the principal pursuit of the inhabitants.


The Chalcolithic pottery at Tel Te’o attests to the presence of both Galilean and Golanian traditions, as well as to a unique group of bowls designated as Ḥula ware, characterized by a black or red slip and incised decoration filled with chalk. The flint tool assemblage includes major diagnostic types such as backed sickle blades, trapezoidal adzes, tabular scrapers, retouched “gigantic” rectangular flakes, and perforated disks usually associated with the northern Chalcolithic tradition. Stone artifacts, mostly basalt, include grinding stones, mace heads, V-shaped bowls, fenestrated pedestal bowls, and plain pillar bowls associated with the “house-idols” of the Golan Chalcolithic.


THE EARLY BRONZE AGE I. The settlement of stratum V was built according to an entirely new plan, consisting of three widely spaced, curvilinear structures. The even height of the tops of the stone walls and the debris layers on the floors suggest that the superstructures were made of mud bricks. Floors consisted of beaten earth and were partly paved with flat stones. The longest building was subdivided by a curved partition wall. The entrance to another dwelling was located in the long straight wall and was marked by a door socket and sill giving access to the sunken interior. Beneath these dwellings, three infant jar-burials were found. The open area between the houses functioned as a courtyard and included various installations. The most unusual feature was a stone-lined drainage channel crossing the area, which was necessary to prevent the build-up of flood deposits and the undercutting of the house foundations.

The architectural remains of stratum IV were poorly preserved; however, some curved wall segments are sufficient to indicate that the structures in this stratum, like those of stratum V, were curvilinear.

The ceramic assemblage of strata V–IV is characterized by new forms such as gray burnished ware vessels, ledge and loop handles, and red slips applied in a technique unknown in the preceding Chalcolithic strata. The lithics include a well-defined Canaanean blade technology, used mostly for sickle blades. These observations correspond with the architectural evidence, indicating the arrival of bearers of a new culture unrelated to the earlier occupation. The cultural break between strata VI and V suggests a chronological gap of uncertain length within the second third of the fourth millennium BCE. This new culture marks the beginning of the Early Bronze Age IA.

THE EARLY BRONZE AGE II. No clear architectural remains of stratum III were found, but the Early Bronze Age II presence on the mound was indicated by the ceramic evidence deriving from grave fills in the stratum I cemetery, and primarily from a large sherd-rich refuse pit. Most sherds in the pit belonged to diagnostic vessels of the metallic ware industry of northern Canaan, produced across the Ḥula Valley in the Mount Hermon foothills.

THE MEDIEVAL PERIOD (?). Architectural features assigned to stratum II were located, for the most part, in soundings made in area B, east of the main excavation area. Remains of a large structure were discovered, its foundations built of stone with two dressed faces. Some of the rooms were paved with stone slabs. Ceramics were scarce, the few diagnostic sherds assigned a medieval date.

THE LATE OTTOMAN PERIOD. Stratum I comprises remains of the cemetery where the Muslim population of the village of Jaḥula, west of the spring, buried their dead. This cemetery covered most of the mound. Graves measuring 2 by 0.4 m were dug to a depth of 1.2 m below the surface. Most were oriented east–west, the head to the west, facing south. Some were placed in a stone cist built of fieldstones or of dressed stones taken from the stratum II buildings. They were usually covered with stone slabs. In area B, the foundations of a large rectangular building were exposed, 19 by 11.5 m in size. The building, damaged by modern road construction, had no preserved floor or associated finds. Since no burials were revealed below its foundations, it is assumed to be contemporary with the cemetery.

EMANUEL EISENBERG

Main publication: E. Eisenberg et al., Tel Te’o: A Neolithic, Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age Site in the Ḥula Valley (IAA Reports 13), Jerusalem 2001.
Studies: E. Eisenberg, ESI 5 (1986), 107–109; id., IEJ 37 (1987), 173–175; id., L’Urbanisation de la Palestine a l’âge du bronze ancien: bilan et perspectives des recherches actuelles. Actes du Colloque d’Emmaus, 20–24.10.1986 (BAR/IS 527/1; ed. P. R. De Miroschedji), 1, Oxford 1989, 29–40; E. Braun, PEQ 121 (1989), 1–43; id., The Early Northern EB I of Israel and Jordan (M.A. thesis), Jerusalem 1991; A. Miller Rosen, Mitekufat Ha’even 22 (1989), 68–77; id., Current Research in Phytolith Analysis: Applications in Archaeology and Paleoecology (MASCA Research Papers in Science and Archaeology 11; eds. D. M. Pearsall & D. R. Pipero), Philadelphia 1993, 161–171; R. Greenberg (& N. Porat), BASOR 301 (1996), 5–24; id., The Hula Valley from the Beginning of the Early Bronze Age to the End of the Middle Bronze Age IIA (Ph.D. diss.), Jerusalem 1996; id., Early Urbanizations in the Levant: A Regional Narrative (New Approaches to Anthropological Archaeology), London 2002; A. Enea, Contributi e materiali di archeologia orientale 7 (1997), 163–176; P. Smith, The Practical Impact of Science on Near Eastern and Aegean Archaeology (Wiener Laboratory Publications 3; eds. S. Pike & S. Gitin), London 1999, 71–74; Y. Goren & S. Zuckermann, Ceramics and Change, Sheffield 2000, 165–182.

Join the BAS Library!

Already a library member? Log in here.