First Person: The Big Debate - The BAS Library
Login
Home > Magazines > BAR > November/December 2002

First Person: The Big Debate

The battle over the Bible raises more questions than it answers—but you’ll learn a lot if you listen in.

By Hershel Shanks

The hottest issue today in the study of Biblical history and archaeology is the question of the Bible’s essential historicity: How true is the Bible? Unfortunately, the issues are hideously complicated.a Every time I try to write a summary sentence about the controversy, I find that it is wrong or at least needs qualification. For example, in an early draft of this piece, the following sentence appeared: “For those who believe in the literal truth of the Bible, the issue is simple: The Bible says it; therefore it must be true.” Well, that’s not exactly true. Evangelicals and even […]

You have already read your free article for this month. Please join the BAS Library or become an All Access member of BAS to gain full access to this article and so much more.

Join the BAS Library!

Already a library member? Log in here.

Footnotes

1.

See Steven Feldman, “First Person: Is the Bible a Bunch of Historical Hooey?” BAR 28:03.

2.

See my “Dancing in Denver: From One Scholarly Meeting to Another,” BAR 28:02.

3.

See Strata, in this issue.

4.

ReViews, BAR 27:02.

5.

Philip R. Davies, “‘House of David’ Built on Sand: The Sins of the Biblical Maximizers,” BAR 20:04.

6.

See the refutation of seven leading scholars: Jo Ann Hackett, Frank Moore Cross, P. Kyle McCarter, Jr., Ada Yardeni, André Lemaire, Esther Eshel and Avi Hurwitz, “The Siloam Inscription Ain’t Hasmonean,” BAR 23:02.

7.

See, for example, Hershel Shanks, “The Biblical Minimalists: Expunging Israel’s Past,” BR 13:03.

Endnotes

1.

See Religious Study News/SBL Edition, June 2002.