In Their Own Words

020

Now retired from teaching but not from digging, Tel-Aviv University’s David Ussishkin has directed a seminal excavation at Lachish and another at Jezreel, has surveyed tombs in Jerusalem and currently codirects (with Israel Finkelstein) a major excavation at Megiddo. He is also a world traveler. In the photograph below, he is shown with his wife, archaeologist Lily Singer-Avitz, in southern Argentina, not far from the South Pole. Not long before that, he traveled to Hong Kong to deliver the prestigious Chuen King Lectures, from which the following excerpt was taken.ons uncovered several phases of occupation from the Persian period through the Byzantine period, including conclusive evidence of a Samaritan temple built in the fifth century B.C.E.¹

I always attempt to emphasize the distinction between the study of the material culture, on the one hand, and the study of the Biblical text and its interpretation, on the other. With the remains of the material culture being largely poorly preserved, mostly devoid of inscriptions and open to different interpretations by researchers, it is not easy to combine these material remains with the Biblical text, as would have been ideal. In many cases, the material remains aid in elucidating the text and its historical information; they aid in attempts to understand better the meaning of the texts and supply certain essential information on the background of the culture in which the text was composed. And vice versa, in other cases the text helps us understand the material culture …

Regarding Jerusalem, for example, the Biblical text gives detailed but largely difficult descriptions of the royal palace and the adjacent temple. Knowing the topography of the Temple Mount and possessing ample data on contemporary palaces and temples elsewhere, we are able to achieve a better idea of what was built in Jerusalem …

Some archaeologists argue that the description of Solomonic Jerusalem in the Biblical text is reliable and correct. They conclude that evidence of the Solomonic city has not yet been found, but they are sure the evidence is there, waiting to be discovered in future excavations. Other archaeologists argue that after 160 years of extensive archaeological investigations, we are now in possession of sufficient and reliable archaeological data, and that the present conclusions will hardly change in the future. It follows that the Biblical text should be interpreted in a different way. It is possible, for instance, that we have here [in the Bible] a description of Jerusalem at the time of the later kings of Judah in the eighth and seventh centuries B.C.E. In any case, at present, we do not have an agreed solution to this baffling problem …

[Nevertheless] I have to acknowledge the inspiration which the Biblical text, its stories, descriptions and personae, give to the field archaeologist on Biblical sites … The archaeologist sees in front of him ruins, stones and earth, but he is inspired in his work by the text and by the great figures featured in it.

Now retired from teaching but not from digging, Tel-Aviv University’s David Ussishkin has directed a seminal excavation at Lachish and another at Jezreel, has surveyed tombs in Jerusalem and currently codirects (with Israel Finkelstein) a major excavation at Megiddo. He is also a world traveler. In the photograph below, he is shown with his wife, archaeologist Lily Singer-Avitz, in southern Argentina, not far from the South Pole. Not long before that, he traveled to Hong Kong to deliver the prestigious Chuen King Lectures, from which the following excerpt was taken.ons uncovered several phases of occupation from the Persian period […]