Endnote 30 – The Resurrection in Recent Scholarly Research

On Paul’s implied acceptance of the empty tomb, see Brown, The Virginal Conception, pp. 124–127; Stein, “Was the Tomb Really Empty?” JETS 20 (1977), pp. 24ff.; William L. Craig. “The Empty Tomb of Jesus,” in Gospel Perspectives: Studies of History and Tradition in the Four Gospels, Vol. 2, ed. Richard T. France & David Wenham (Sheffield, UK: JSOT Press, 1981), pp. 178ff.; Grayston, John “The Empty Tomb,” ET 92 (1981), pp. 263–267; Meinolf Habitzky, “Noch einmal: das ‘leere’ Grabe,” IKZ/C 11 (1982), pp. 403–406; Lorenz Oberlinner, “Verkundigung der Auferweckung Jesu im geoffneten und leeren Grad: Zu einem vernachlassigsten Aspekt in der Diskussion um den Grab Jesu,” Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 73 (1982), pp. 159–182; Lindars, “Jesus Risen: Replies,” Theology 89 (1986), pp. 90–96, and “Jesus Risen: Replies,” Theology 89 (1986), pp. 296–300; David Vaughan, “New Light Upon the Empty Tomb: The Shroud and Mediumistic Evidence,” Journal of Religious and Psychological Research 9 (1986), p. 98–102; Ronald J. Sider, “St. Paul’s Understanding of the Nature and Significance of the Resurrection in I Corinthians XV 1–19, ” Novum Testamentum 19 (1977), pp. 124–141; Antonio Vargas-Machuca, “Reflexiones sobre la Resurreccion de Jesus,” Razón y Fe 217 (1988), pp. 355–60.