Image Details
John Gibbons Studios/by permission of president and fellows of Magdalen College, Oxford
Carsten Thiede, relying on recently discovered examples of Greek handwriting, claims that these fragments of Matthew date considerably earlier than the end of the second century, as thought by most scholars. But just how much earlier is something of a question: According to reports in the popular press, Thiede thinks the fragments date to the mid-first century; in a scholarly paper, however, he argues only for a late-first century date—a world of difference because the latter matches the date most scholars assign to the composition of Matthew, while the mid-first century attribution should make Matthew a witness to the events of Jesus’ last days.