Even as the first freezing drop of water trickled beneath our wetsuits, we knew that this dive would be historic. We checked our scuba equipment one last time, and then slowly descended into the deep blue waters off the ancient Mediterranean port of Akko, in northern Israel. Our goal: to find the small snail used in ancient times to produce tekhelet, the brilliant blue dye prized in the Bible—but lost to the modern world.
For the first few minutes, we saw nothing. Then my dive partner and old school buddy Baruch Sterman, a physicist who lives in Israel, purposefully reached forward to grab what looked like a rock. He flipped the “rock” over—it was in fact an algae-covered shell that had blended imperceptibly into its background. Before the dive, Rabbi Elyahu Tevger, the leader of our expedition, had precisely described the mollusk we were searching for and had shown us photos. Thanks to his training, Sterman and I immediately recognized the “rock” as having the classic profile of the snail species—called in Latin Murex trunculus—that gave the ancient world the color blue.
We gathered about 150 of the 2- to 4-inch-long snails before our oxygen ran out, and we took our hoard to the ancient fortress of Akko. A crowd of Arab children gathered round to see what this odd group of divers and ultra-Orthodox Jews was doing in their waters. As Rabbi Tevger broke open a snail to show us how the dye was once extracted, the children yelled exuberantly “chilzun, chilzun,” the Arabic word for “snail”—an echo of the term chilazon used in the Talmud to describe the source of the biblical blue.
034
In the ancient world, colors and dyes held great social and economic importance. Dyes like tekhelet, extracted from rare sources, were used only by the wealthiest and the most powerful. The earliest extant references to tekhelet are business records. A cuneiform tablet from Ugarit (present-day Syria), dated to about 1500 B.C.E. records the amount of takiltu, “blue wool,” owed to a merchant.1 A recently rediscovered and deciphered seventh-century B.C.E. Babylonian tablet in the British Museum contains the earliest known instructions for dyeing wool with the colors takiltu and argamantu.2
In the Hebrew Bible, “blue (tekhelet), purple (argaman) and scarlet (tolaat shani)” yarns are listed along with gold, silver and copper as gifts suitable for God (Exodus 25:4). The desert Tabernacle was made of ten strips of “fine twisted linen, of blue, purple and scarlet yarns, with a design of cherubim worked into them” (Exodus 26:1). The curtain that partitions off the Holy of Holies, the embroidered screen at the Tabernacle’s entrance and the priestly robes were also made of the same colors. In the Book of Judges, the booty taken from the Midianites includes the purple robes of kings as well as 1,700 shekels worth of golden earrings (Judges 8:26). When in the Book of Chronicles, Solomon asks Hiram of Tyre to send him workers to build the Temple, he specifically requests “an artisan skilled to work in gold, silver, bronze, and iron, and in purple, crimson and blue fabrics” (2 Chronicles 2:7). At the end of the Book of Esther, Mordecai emerges from the king’s palace dressed in “royal robes of blue and white, with a great golden crown and a mantle of fine linen and purple” (Esther 8:15).
In Jewish tradition, the blue dye tekhelet has a special role. In the Torah, the Israelites are commanded to wear at all times a tekhelet-colored thread:
The Lord said to Moses as follows: Speak to the Israelite people and instruct them to make for themselves fringes (tzitzit) on the corners of their garments throughout the ages; let them attach a cord of blue (tekhelet) to the fringe at each corner. That shall be your fringe; look at it and recall all the commandments of the Lord and observe them, so that you do not follow your heart and eyes in your lustful urge.
(Numbers 15:37–39)
To this day, observant Jews have striven to follow this mitzvah, or commandment, but it hasn’t been easy. The source for the biblical dye is not mentioned in the Bible, and although it is discussed in the Talmud and other ancient sources, the process for producing the dye was lost to the Jews. By the turn of the first millennium C.E., tekhelet was no longer available.
We don’t know for sure why tekhelet disappeared: Perhaps it was because of its 036high cost or because Jews had lost access to materials needed for its production. Perhaps production decreased because the dye’s use was banned or limited in some way: In the Talmud, a city called Luz is identified as a place “where tekhelet is dyed”3; elsewhere, the Talmud tells of two men who are captured by Roman soldiers because “they had in their hands items made in Luz.”4 In the Roman period, Julius Caesar and Augustus Caesar had restricted the wearing of purple garments to the ruling classes; Emperor Nero went even further and decreed that only he could wear purple. It is possible royal blue fell under the same ruling.
At some point, a cheaper alternative was made available although this, too, fell out of use along with tekhelet. A blue dye made from the kala ilan plant (popularly known as indigo or woad) came to be used by unscrupulous merchants of tzitzit, despite many rabbis’ objections. The dye from kala ilan looked just like tekhelet;5 the Talmud says that only God could distinguish between the two. But because the Bible specifically states that tzitzit be dyed with tekhelet, the rabbis cautioned their students to “only buy tekhelet from an expert” as a way of ensuring authenticity.6
Despite the rabbis’ efforts to maintain the use of tekhelet, by the end of the first millennium C.E. we find rabbis making statements like “we have no tekhelet in the present day”7 and “for many days we have not heard of anyone who has merited to wear tekhelet on his garment.”8 The dye was lost. Only white tzitzit were worn.
For centuries after, people have tried to re-create the dying process. Their search for biblical blue reads like a detective story, with clues coming from the Bible, the Talmud, classical authors and medieval rabbis, archaeological remains and the serendipitous discoveries of modern scientists.
The Talmud, the authoritative compendium of Jewish law and lore,a is one of the most helpful sources for pinpointing the source of tekhelet. Yet, it has also provided some false leads.
The Talmud contains extensive discussions of tzitzit and of exactly how the commandment to wear them was to be followed. It does not specify how to make the dye, but it does give a generic term for the creature from which tekhelet was derived: chilazon, which is generally translated as “snail.” Throughout history, however, some have argued that the term chilazon may refer to any mollusk—whether snail, squid, octopus, clam or other shellfish. This has caused great controversy over the true identity of the creature.
In the 15th century, Rabbi David ben Zamra, chief rabbi of Egypt, sounded a note of hope about the possibility of rediscovering the source of tekhelet. “It is possible that the species is still to be found, but it is not known how it can be fished.”9 In the late 19th century, Rabbi Gershon Chanoch Henoch Leiner, the scion of the Hasidic Radziner dynasty, set off across Europe in an attempt to find the source of the lost tekhelet. His exhaustive research resulted in three volumes on the subject. In the end, he concluded that the Talmud’s chilazon was the elusive mollusk sepia officianalis—a squid. (He’d seen one in an aquarium in Naples in 1888.) Rabbi Leiner succeeded in dying cloth blue with specially prepared squid’s ink on the first day of Hanukkah in 1889, and then produced 10,000 sets of tzitzit for his followers. Most rabbinical authorities did not accept Rabbi Leiner’s identification of the chilazon, however. The dye made from squid ink lacks the permanence ascribed to the ancient color, and it has no historic or archaeologic record of use. A pamphlet condemning Leiner’s tekhelet was published in 1891. It was called Psil Tekhelet (Invalid Tekhelet)—a play on the biblical phrase P’til Tekhelet, meaning “string of tekhelet.”
In 1913, Rabbi Issac Halevi Herzog, who later became the first Chief Rabbi of the State of Israel, wrote his doctoral thesis at the University of London on tekhelet. Herzog was revered as a prodigy by all sectors of Judaism. What made him so spectacular was his immense secular knowledge: He was fluent in a dozen 037languages, he wrote a 12-volume set contrasting Jewish, Roman and British law, and he had degrees in law as well as math. Herzog concluded that the Janthina mollusk was the best option to identify a true source of tekhelet.10 Janthina has only one thing going for it: The shell is a beautiful violet blue, “the color of the sea” as the Talmud states. But nobody has ever succeeded in making any color dye but brown from it.
Fish, squid, Janthina snail—none of these suggestions works well with the evidence from ancient authors and modern science.
Geography is perhaps our best clue to identifying the chilazon—and thus, tekhelet. The Babylonian Talmud relates that when an old man near Achziv, on the 038northern Israeli coast, was asked, “What is your profession?” he answered: “I am a tekheletchilazon fisherman.”11 Elsewhere the Talmud suggests that chilazon come from the portion of land allotted to the tribe of Zebulun—that is, the region in northern Israel between the Sea of Galilee and the Mediterranean.12 The Talmud also tells us that the dye-producing chilazons are found between the cliffs of Haifa and Tyre.
The mention of Tyre, the leading trade center and port of the Phoenicians, is an important tip-off to the chilazon’s identity. In antiquity, the Phoenicians were responsible for the production of the priceless purple dye called argaman in the Bible. Indeed, the industry was so important to the Phoenicians that they were named for it: Phoinix, in Greek, means purple.
Fortunately, the biblical purple, unlike biblical blue, has left a clear record of its manufacture and use in the ancient world. Following the purple trail will lead us to the source of chilazon. As we shall see, it’s no coincidence that argaman and tekhelet are almost always mentioned together in the Bible.
Classical sources make frequent reference to Tyrian purple, as does the Bible. Remember that King Solomon asked the Phoenician king Hiram of Tyre to send him artisans skilled in working “purple, blue and crimson” to decorate the Temple.
The first-century C.E. Roman historian Pliny, in his Natural History speaks of a “mad lust for purple” and reports that “the best Asiatic purple comes from Tyre. He even explains how the purple dye was produced, beginning with its extraction from the Murex snail: “The Murex … has the famous flower of purple, sought after for dyeing robes, in the middle of its throat. Here there 039is a white vein of very scanty fluid from which that precious dye suffused with a dark rose color, is drained.”13
In 1858, French zoologist Henri de Lacaze-Duthiers confirmed Pliny’s identification of the snail as Murex. Lacaze-Duthiers observed a fisherman off the coast of Italy painting his shirt with the yellow juice of a freshly broken snail and saw that the stain soon turned a reddish-purple color. Lacaze-Duthiers identified the snail as a Murex. Through subsequent study, he determined that three mollusks in the Murex family—Murex trunculus, Murex brandaris and Purpura hemastoma—were capable of producing the purple dyes that had fetched such a high price in antiquity.14
Archaeology bears out Lacaze-Duthiers’s discovery. Remains of dye works containing enormous accumulations of crushed Murex shells have been found in the Phoenician cities of Tyre, Sidon and Sarepta, in Lebanon; Dor, Tel Mor, Shiqmona, Akko and Tel Keisan, in Israel; and Carthage, the Phoenicians’ most important colony.15 (In Virgil’s Aeneid, Aeneas languishes with Dido in Carthage, adorned in Tyrean purple robes.)
In Greco-Roman times, the importance of the Murex to the city of Tyre was reflected in the city’s coins, many of which bear an image of the snail.16 Others show a dog and a snail: According to legend, the purple dye was first discovered by Hercules’s dog, who was frolicking in the waves, foraging for food; when he emerged from the ocean and returned to his master, his lips were colored bright purple from the snails he had consumed.17
So, the Talmud locates the manufacture of tekhelet in the very place that both classical texts and archaeology tell us purple was created: on the northern coast of Israel (and Lebanon). And the Talmud identifies the source of tekhelet as chilazon, a snail. Could it be that the two colors actually came from the same animal?
A chance discovery made by Otto Elsner of the Shenkar Institute of Engineering and Design in Tel Aviv suggests this is the case. Elsner was trying to produce some purple wool by using the dye extracted from the hypobranchial gland of the Murex snail, but accidentally turned the wool blue instead.
The dye obtained from the Murex is called dibromoindigo; it consists of a molecule of the blue dye indigo with two bromine atoms attached to it. When it is first removed from the snail, it is yellowish, but when it is exposed to the air for five to ten minutes, it becomes purple. The molecule is capable of forming a chemical bond with wool, which is what makes it a permanent color that won’t wash out. To create a permanent bond, several chemical reactions must take place. First, limestone or another base must be added to water to create a basic solution. Next, the solution must be reduced—meaning that the oxygen must be removed, using a chemical such as ammonia (Pliny recommended using old urine, which contains ammonia). This causes the dye to dissolve and the solution to turn a darkish yellow-brown color. At this point, the dye is ready. Wool dipped in the solution will remain white until it is pulled out and re-oxygenated through contact with air. It is striking to see: A purple color seems to magically appear on the material before your eyes!
Elsner was following these very steps one sunny day 30 years ago. But instead of immediately dipping the wool into the yellow solution, he left the dye sitting in the sunshine for a few minutes before dunking wool into it. When he finally pulled the wool out and waited for the usual purple color to appear, he was amazed to see the wool change to a vibrant blue instead.
Elsner’s chance discovery has shown us the most likely recipe for biblical blue. The secret ingredient is the sun! Unbeknownst to Elsner—or anyone else at that time—the dibromoindigo (purple dye) solution is affected by the sun’s radiation. Sunlight causes the bond between the bromine atoms and the indigo molecule to break down, leaving only indigo—blue dye—active in the solution. (The chemical indigo derived from exposing the purple dye to sunlight is in fact chemically identical to the indigo produced by the kala ilan plant. No wonder the rabbis had trouble telling them apart!) Depending on the amount of sunlight the dye is exposed to, the secretions of the Murex snail can produce a range of colors from red to royal purple to blue.
Thanks to Elsner’s discovery, the ancient biblical process has been rediscovered, and thousands of people around the globe now wear tekhelet-dyed tzitzit on their prayer shawls, just as Jews did in ancient times. After our dive about a decade ago, my colleagues and I founded the nonprofit P’til Tekhelet foundation, which harvests Murex snails to make the dye to manufacture tzitzit. (About 30 snails are needed for one set of tzitzit strings. We harvest thousands every year!) The success of the reinstitution of tekhelet breathes new life into the verse “and the triple spun thread shall not easily be broken” (Ecclesiastes 4:12).
For more information on the P’til Tekhelet foundation, visit their Web site, www.tekhelet.com.
Even as the first freezing drop of water trickled beneath our wetsuits, we knew that this dive would be historic. We checked our scuba equipment one last time, and then slowly descended into the deep blue waters off the ancient Mediterranean port of Akko, in northern Israel. Our goal: to find the small snail used in ancient times to produce tekhelet, the brilliant blue dye prized in the Bible—but lost to the modern world. For the first few minutes, we saw nothing. Then my dive partner and old school buddy Baruch Sterman, a physicist who lives in Israel, purposefully […]
You have already read your free article for this month. Please join the BAS Library or become an All Access member of BAS to gain full access to this article and so much more.
The Talmud was written and collected between 200 B.C.E. and 500 C.E. It has come down to us in two versions, called the Palestinian Talmud and the Babylonian Talmud.
Endnotes
1.
F. Thureau-Dangin, “Un comptoir de laine poupre à Ugarit d’après une tablette de Ras-Shamra,” Syria 15 (1934), pp. 137–146.
2.
Personal communication with Dr. Irving Finkel, Department of Western Asiatic Antiquities, British Museum.
3.
Babylonian Talmud, Sota 46b.
4.
Babylonian Talmud, Shabbat 26a.
5.
Babylonian Talmud, Baba Metzia 61b.
6.
Babylonian Talmud, Menachot.
7.
Responsa of the Radbaz.
8.
Sepher Ha Chinuch, Commandments of the Tzitzit.
9.
Isaac Halevi Herzog, Hebrew Porphyrology (Jerusalem: Keter, 1987), p. 114.
10.
Herzog, Porphyrology. Herzog concluded Janthina was the best option when he found that the Murex only gave a purple color and that the color of the dry polished shell is brown and not “similar to the sea” as described in the Talmud. But his doctorate is written about Murex, and only when faced with the two problems did he suggest Janthina. He even admits that he prefers the Murex alternative. Had he seen a Murex snail covered with blue-green algae and had he understood the chemistry and seen its intense blue dye, I am sure he would have proclaimed the Murex as the source of tekhelet.
11.
Babylonian Talmud, Menachot 45.
12.
In Deuteronomy 33:19, Zebulun is told that the blessing of his tribe is “those things buried in the sand.” The Talmud explains that “those things buried” refers to the tekhelet snail (chilazon).
13.
Pliny, Natural History, 9.125–128.
14.
Henri de Lacaze-Duthiers, “Mémoire sur le Pourpre,” Annales des Sciences Naturelles comprenant la Zoologie, la Botanique, 4th series, no. 12 (1859), pp. 5–84.
15.
Nira Karmon and Ehud Spanier, Archeological Evidence of the Purple Dye Industry from Israel (Jerusalem: Keter, 1987).
16.
See G.F. Hill, Catalogue of the Greek Coins of Phoenicia (London: British Museum, 1910, pp. cxxii-cxxxix.
17.
The legend is recorded in the second century C.E. by the Egyptian Greek lexicographer Julius Pollox in his Onomasticon 10.45.