Where the Ancient Temple of Jerusalem Stood
Extant “foundation stone” for the Ark of the Covenant is identified
You have already read your free article for this month. Please join the BAS Library or become an All Access member of BAS to gain full access to this article and so much more.
Already a library member? Log in here.
Institution user? Log in with your IP address or Username
Footnotes
The Mishnah is a concise collection of laws, regulations and customs governing religious practices during the latter part of the Second Temple period and continuing after its destruction. It was codified about 200 A.D., but the materials it contains are considerably older.
At the entrance to the Temple Mount, a posted notice authorized by the Israel Police states explicity that photography is forbidden only within the buildings.
See James Fleming, “The Undiscovered Gate Beneath Jerusalem’s Golden Gate,” BAR 09:01.
See Fleming’s article, “The Undiscovered Gate Beneath Jerusalem’s Golden Gate,” BAR 09:01.
Mr. Hendrik J. Bruins, a geologist, was unable to say for certain whether or not this rock was naturally flat or had been worked. There are no signs of tool marks on the surface, over which run natural cracks, so the former possibility is to be preferred.
The numbered features in the text may be located by these numbers on the plans and pictures in this article.
Although the Temple compound was in the shape of a trapezium, the Hékhal or central building of the compound did not necessarily have this shape.
The southern, northern and western foundations of the Inner Court, as assumed above, were identified in the following way. Wall 6 and rock-mass 1 are the innermost finds of the trapezium shape on its northern side and give the impression of forming the right angle of a corner. The rock-mass 1 was cut on two levels. The upper level is horizontal to within a few centimeters, as if it had served as the foundation of flooring. The lower level, separated from the upper by a series of projections, shows the remains of masonry, as if a wall had occupied that space. The Jerusalem architect, Mr. Terence Greenberg, pointed out to me that the series of projections indicates a gate at the position of the rock-mass. Likewise, cistern 9 is the innermost find of the trapezium shape on its southern side. At an early stage of the investigation, I conjectured that this cistern conforms to the water reservoir in the chamber of Gullah (Middot 5:4) adjoining the Inner Court on its southern flank. Later work has confirmed this in every detail that could be examined.
The Tanna’im were the Jewish scholars who lived in the Holy Land in the latter part of the Second Temple period and after.
Endnotes
A summary with source references is given by W. Robertson Smith in Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 23, p. 169 (1888).
For recent appraisals of this choice of site, see M. Avi-Yonah, Jerusalem Revealed (Israel Exploration Society: Jerusalem, 1975), p. 13, and B. Bagatti, Recherches sur le Site du Temple de Jerusalem (I–VII siecle), Publications du Studium Biblicum Franciscanum, collectio minor 22 (Franciscan Printing Press Jerusalem, 1979), pp. 26–31.
Our Work in Palestine, issued by the Committee of the Palestine Exploration Fund (Bentley: London, 1873), p. 137.
In my article in Ariel, No. 43, p. 93, the height is given as seven meters, so quoted by C. Schick. The height given here was determined from aerial survey and should be correct.
C. Warren and C. R. Conder, The Survey of Western Palestine, Jerusalem (Palestine Exploration Fund: London, 1884), p. 241, for 40.6 cm, and Y. M. Toqachinsqi, The Holy City and the Temple, part 4, (Jerusalem, 1970), p. 6, for 66 cm [in Hebrew].
Robert Balgarnie Young Scott, in “Weights and Measures of the Bible,” The Biblical Archaeologist vol. 22 (1959), pp. 22–40, fixes it at 44.5 cm.
R. P. S. Hubbard, in “The Topography of Ancient Jerusalem,” Palestine Exploration Quarterly vol. 98 (1966), pp. 130–154, fixes it at 44.65 cm.
Ehud Netzer, in “Ritual Baths of the Second Temple Period at Jericho,” Qadmoniot vol. 11 (1978), pp 54–59 (in Hebrew), presents data that yield a measurement of 45 cm.
C. Warren and C. R. Conder, in The Survey of Western Palestine, Jerusalem, (Palestine Exploration Fund: London, 1884), p. 357, present data that yield a measurement of 44.64 cm.
C. Warren, in “The Evolution of Ancient Weights and Measures” (1924), p. 12, gives a figure of 44.7 cm.
C. Warren, “The Site of the Temple of the Jews.” Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archaeology 7 (1881), part 2, p. 16.